Critical Analysis of another kind.

How do you critically analyse the work of the person supposed to be helping you? Sure, they should be used to it by now owning a doctorate of archaeology card, and having been where you are now, but still.

It looks better if you disagree, of course, as long as you have a very valid reason for doing so because they know their work better than you and can at any moment knock you down, but what extent do you disagree?

I'm feeling a little bit in a dilemma now trying to write such a critical analysis on my superviser's work because from that I have developed my research question.

So, help me, because I'm a bit scared.

Comments

Popular Posts